> > On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:50:30 +0200 Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Can you please add this to -mm. Sometimes that has wonderful effect
> > > on the willingness of people to look at a patch.
> >
> > sure ;)
>
> Andrew please don't, it's in my "to review" pile.
Yeah, and
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 03:04:43 -0700
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:50:30 +0200 Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can you please add this to -mm. Sometimes that has wonderful effect
> > on the willingness of people to look at a patch.
>
> sure ;)
From: Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:50:30 +0200
> Can you please add this to -mm. Sometimes that has wonderful effect
> on the willingness of people to look at a patch.
No, I will merge this into my networking tree when I get the
chance to review your patch and it
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:50:30 +0200 Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you please add this to -mm. Sometimes that has wonderful effect
> on the willingness of people to look at a patch.
sure ;)
> It fixes a bug in AF_UNIX sockets that affects the ulockmgr library in
> the fuse packa
Andrew,
Can you please add this to -mm. Sometimes that has wonderful effect
on the willingness of people to look at a patch.
It fixes a bug in AF_UNIX sockets that affects the ulockmgr library in
the fuse package. And for some reason it doesn't seem to interest the
netdev guys in the least.
Th
