On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:53:30PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Simon Horman writes:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 01:01:39PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Instead store ipvs in extra2 so that proc_do_defense_mode can easily
> >> find the ipvs that it's value is associated with.
> >>
Simon Horman writes:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 01:01:39PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Instead store ipvs in extra2 so that proc_do_defense_mode can easily
>> find the ipvs that it's value is associated with.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman"
>
> I am wondering if this fix should b
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 01:01:39PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Instead store ipvs in extra2 so that proc_do_defense_mode can easily
> find the ipvs that it's value is associated with.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman"
I am wondering if this fix should be included in v4.3 and stable.
C
Instead store ipvs in extra2 so that proc_do_defense_mode can easily
find the ipvs that it's value is associated with.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman"
---
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 8 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
Instead store ipvs in extra2 so that proc_do_defense_mode can easily
find the ipvs that it's value is associated with.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman"
---
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 8 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
