From: Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:38:04 -0800
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:15 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Mahesh Bandewar
>> Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 15:15:43 -0800
>>
>>> From: Mahesh Bandewar
>>>
>>> Packets that don't have dest mac as the mac of the master dev
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:15 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Mahesh Bandewar
> Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 15:15:43 -0800
>
>> From: Mahesh Bandewar
>>
>> Packets that don't have dest mac as the mac of the master device should
>> not be entertained by the IPvlan rx-handler. This is mostly true as the
From: Mahesh Bandewar
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 15:15:43 -0800
> From: Mahesh Bandewar
>
> Packets that don't have dest mac as the mac of the master device should
> not be entertained by the IPvlan rx-handler. This is mostly true as the
> packet path mostly takes care of that, except when the mast
From: Mahesh Bandewar
Packets that don't have dest mac as the mac of the master device should
not be entertained by the IPvlan rx-handler. This is mostly true as the
packet path mostly takes care of that, except when the master device is
a virtual device. As demonstrated in the following case -
