On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 15:47 -0800, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) wrote:
> [...]
> >> @@ -371,10 +372,12 @@ static void arp_solicit(struct neighbour *neigh,
> >> struct sk_buff *skb)
> >>
> >> probes -= NEIGH_VAR(neigh->parms, UCAST_PROBES);
> >> if (probes < 0) {
> >> + me
[...]
>> @@ -371,10 +372,12 @@ static void arp_solicit(struct neighbour *neigh,
>> struct sk_buff *skb)
>>
>> probes -= NEIGH_VAR(neigh->parms, UCAST_PROBES);
>> if (probes < 0) {
>> + memset(&null_dev_hw_addr, 0, dev->addr_len);
>> if (!(neigh->nud_state & NU
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 14:56 -0800, Mahesh Bandewar wrote:
> From: Mahesh Bandewar
>
> If initial broadcast probe(s) is/are lost, the neigh entry wont have
> valid address of the neighbour. In a situation like this, the fall
> back should be to send a broadcast probe, however the code logic
> cont
From: Mahesh Bandewar
If initial broadcast probe(s) is/are lost, the neigh entry wont have
valid address of the neighbour. In a situation like this, the fall
back should be to send a broadcast probe, however the code logic
continues sending ucast probes to 00:00:00:00:00:00. The default value
of
