On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 01:55:03AM +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 05:29:46PM +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> >
> > As pointed out in the discussion on v3, this patch may result in
> > significantly higher CPU consumption with multiple threads competing on
> > a saturated out
On 2021/4/20 7:55, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 05:29:46PM +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
>>
>> As pointed out in the discussion on v3, this patch may result in
>> significantly higher CPU consumption with multiple threads competing on
>> a saturated outgoing device. I missed this
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 05:29:46PM +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
>
> As pointed out in the discussion on v3, this patch may result in
> significantly higher CPU consumption with multiple threads competing on
> a saturated outgoing device. I missed this submission so that I haven't
> checked it yet
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 09:16:48AM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> Lockless qdisc has below concurrent problem:
> cpu0 cpu1
> . .
> q->enqueue .
> . .
> qdisc_run_begin() .
> . .
> d
Lockless qdisc has below concurrent problem:
cpu0 cpu1
. .
q->enqueue .
. .
qdisc_run_begin() .
. .
dequeue_skb() .
. .
sch_direct_xmit()
