Hi Jakub,
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:03 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> Applied, thanks Sven.
>
> I'll leave it out of our stable submission, and expect Sasha's
> autoselection bot to pick it up. This should give us more time
> for testing before the patch makes its way to stable trees.
> Let's see
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:19:54 -0500 Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> From: Sven Van Asbroeck
>
> Even if there is more rx data waiting on the chip, the rx napi poll fn
> will never run more than once - it will always read a few buffers, then
> bail out and re-arm interrupts. Which results in ping-pong b
From: Sven Van Asbroeck
Even if there is more rx data waiting on the chip, the rx napi poll fn
will never run more than once - it will always read a few buffers, then
bail out and re-arm interrupts. Which results in ping-pong between napi
and interrupt.
This defeats the purpose of napi, and is b
