On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> * A packet is received that is encapsulated with two layers of GRE. It
>> looks like this: Eth|IP|GRE|IP|GRE|IP|TCP
>> * The packet is processed through GRO successfully. skb->encapsulatio
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Alexander Duyck
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Alexander Duyck
wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Alexander Duyck
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Alexander Duyck
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Alexander Duyck
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Alexander Duyck
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Alexander Duyck
wrot
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Alexander Duyck
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Alexander Duyck
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Alexander Duyck
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Alexander Duyck
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>
From: Jesse Gross
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 21:38:34 -0700
> Generally speaking, multiple levels of encapsulation offload are not
> valid.
That's very much not true Jesse.
Please fix the regression you introduced or I will have no choice but to
revert your entire set of changes.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Alexander Duyck
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Sa
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Alexander Duyck
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> When dri
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
When drivers express support for TSO of encapsulated packets, they
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>>> When drivers express support for TSO of encapsulated packets, they
>>> only mean that they can do it for one layer of encapsulatio
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> When drivers express support for TSO of encapsulated packets, they
>> only mean that they can do it for one layer of encapsulation.
>> Supporting additional levels would mean updating, at
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> When drivers express support for TSO of encapsulated packets, they
> only mean that they can do it for one layer of encapsulation.
> Supporting additional levels would mean updating, at a minimum,
> more IP length fields and they are unaware of
When drivers express support for TSO of encapsulated packets, they
only mean that they can do it for one layer of encapsulation.
Supporting additional levels would mean updating, at a minimum,
more IP length fields and they are unaware of this.
No encapsulation device expresses support for handlin
14 matches
Mail list logo