On 10/16/19 7:46 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Marek Vasut
> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:39:18 +0200
>
>> Maybe next time we can do these exercises on patches which are not
>> bugfixes for real issues?
>
> No, we should put changes into the tree which are correctly formed.
>
> If you're not inte
From: Marek Vasut
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:39:18 +0200
> Maybe next time we can do these exercises on patches which are not
> bugfixes for real issues?
No, we should put changes into the tree which are correctly formed.
If you're not interested in learning how to submit changes properly,
we am
On 10/16/19 2:42 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Marek Vasut
> Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:24:03 +0200
>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
>> Fixes: 9d162ed69f51 ("net: phy: micrel: add support for KSZ8795")
>
> I'm sorry to be strict, but as Heiner said the Fixes: tag needs to be
> the first tag.
>
From: Marek Vasut
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:24:03 +0200
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
> Fixes: 9d162ed69f51 ("net: phy: micrel: add support for KSZ8795")
I'm sorry to be strict, but as Heiner said the Fixes: tag needs to be
the first tag.
I'm pushing this back to you so that you can learn how t
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 11:24:03PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The KSZ8051 PHY and the KSZ8794/KSZ8795/KSZ8765 switch share exactly the
> same PHY ID. Since KSZ8051 is higher in the ksphy_driver[] list of PHYs
> in the micrel PHY driver, it is used even with the KSZ87xx switch. This
> is wrong, sin
The KSZ8051 PHY and the KSZ8794/KSZ8795/KSZ8765 switch share exactly the
same PHY ID. Since KSZ8051 is higher in the ksphy_driver[] list of PHYs
in the micrel PHY driver, it is used even with the KSZ87xx switch. This
is wrong, since the KSZ8051 configures registers of the PHY which are
not present
