On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:01:31 +0900
Xin Long wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 6:54 AM Stefano Brivio wrote:
> >
> > We shouldn't abuse exceptions: if the destination MTU is already higher
> > than what we're transmitting, no exception should be created.
> makes sense, shouldn't ip(6) tunnels al
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 6:54 AM Stefano Brivio wrote:
>
> We shouldn't abuse exceptions: if the destination MTU is already higher
> than what we're transmitting, no exception should be created.
makes sense, shouldn't ip(6) tunnels also do this?
>
> Fixes: 52a589d51f10 ("geneve: update skb dst pmt
We shouldn't abuse exceptions: if the destination MTU is already higher
than what we're transmitting, no exception should be created.
Fixes: 52a589d51f10 ("geneve: update skb dst pmtu on tx path")
Fixes: a93bf0ff4490 ("vxlan: update skb dst pmtu on tx path")
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio
Reviewed