On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 5:44 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> Series applied and queued up for -stable.
>
> Please provide a proper "[PATCH net 0/N] " header posting next time.
> All patch series should have one.
Sorry about that. Will do!
Thanks,
neal
Series applied and queued up for -stable.
Please provide a proper "[PATCH net 0/N] " header posting next time.
All patch series should have one.
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Stephen Hemminger
wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 18:54:02 -0400
> Neal Cardwell wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Stephen Hemminger
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 17:49:21 -0400
>> > Neal Cardwell wrote:
>> >
>> >> In bbr_set_pacing_rate(), which de
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 18:54:02 -0400
Neal Cardwell wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Stephen Hemminger
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 17:49:21 -0400
> > Neal Cardwell wrote:
> >
> >> In bbr_set_pacing_rate(), which decides whether to cut the pacing
> >> rate, there was some code that
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Stephen Hemminger
wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 17:49:21 -0400
> Neal Cardwell wrote:
>
>> In bbr_set_pacing_rate(), which decides whether to cut the pacing
>> rate, there was some code that considered exiting STARTUP to be
>> equivalent to the notion of filling th
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 17:49:21 -0400
Neal Cardwell wrote:
> In bbr_set_pacing_rate(), which decides whether to cut the pacing
> rate, there was some code that considered exiting STARTUP to be
> equivalent to the notion of filling the pipe (i.e.,
> bbr_full_bw_reached()). Specifically, as the code w
In bbr_set_pacing_rate(), which decides whether to cut the pacing
rate, there was some code that considered exiting STARTUP to be
equivalent to the notion of filling the pipe (i.e.,
bbr_full_bw_reached()). Specifically, as the code was structured,
exiting STARTUP and going into PROBE_RTT could caus
