On 7/17/15 2:05 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
On 15-07-17 01:38 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>The following test case causes a NULL pointer dereference in cls_bpf:
>
> FOO="1,6 0 0 4294967295,"
> tc filter add dev foo parent 1: bpf bytecode "$FOO" flowid 1:1 action ok
> tc filter replace dev foo
On 07/17/2015 11:05 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
...
Thanks Daniel. Apparently I got this right in cls_basic but botched it
here and in cls_flow.
Yep, it's correct there. :)
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@v
On 15-07-17 01:38 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> The following test case causes a NULL pointer dereference in cls_bpf:
>
> FOO="1,6 0 0 4294967295,"
> tc filter add dev foo parent 1: bpf bytecode "$FOO" flowid 1:1 action ok
> tc filter replace dev foo parent 1: pref 49152 handle 0x1 \
>
The following test case causes a NULL pointer dereference in cls_bpf:
FOO="1,6 0 0 4294967295,"
tc filter add dev foo parent 1: bpf bytecode "$FOO" flowid 1:1 action ok
tc filter replace dev foo parent 1: pref 49152 handle 0x1 \
bpf bytecode "$FOO" flowid 1:1 action drop
The pro
