On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 19:06:31 +0200
Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov
>
> Hi,
> When IFLA_BRPORT_PROXYARP and PROXYARP_WIFI were introduced they weren't
> accounted for in the get_slave_size() callback and didn't get a policy
> entry, so fix it now. Sending as two separate p
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov
Hi,
When IFLA_BRPORT_PROXYARP and PROXYARP_WIFI were introduced they weren't
accounted for in the get_slave_size() callback and didn't get a policy
entry, so fix it now. Sending as two separate patches because the first
one goes further back than the second and thus we g
