Re: [PATCH net-next v5 8/9] ipv6: handling of multicast packets received in VRF

2018-11-07 Thread David Ahern
On 11/7/18 8:36 AM, Mike Manning wrote: > If the skb for multicast packets marked as enslaved to a VRF are > received, then the secondary device index should be used to obtain > the real device. And verify the multicast address against the > enslaved rather than the l3mdev device. > > Signed-off-b

[PATCH net-next v5 8/9] ipv6: handling of multicast packets received in VRF

2018-11-07 Thread Mike Manning
If the skb for multicast packets marked as enslaved to a VRF are received, then the secondary device index should be used to obtain the real device. And verify the multicast address against the enslaved rather than the l3mdev device. Signed-off-by: Dewi Morgan Signed-off-by: Mike Manning --- ne