Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/22] ethtool netlink interface, part 1

2019-03-27 Thread David Miller
From: Michal Kubecek Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:28:06 +0100 > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 02:09:28PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Could you please perhaps split the patchset so it contains max ~15 patches? > > Would 1-17 still be acceptable? I'm OK with ~17 especially considering the scope of this wo

Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/22] ethtool netlink interface, part 1

2019-03-27 Thread Jiri Pirko
Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 03:28:06PM CET, mkube...@suse.cz wrote: >On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 02:09:28PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Could you please perhaps split the patchset so it contains max ~15 patches? > >Would 1-17 still be acceptable? The thing is that patch 16 is the first >where some "normal" no