In fairness to everyone the below deserves a public answer:
> On 27 May 2019, at 21:56, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
>
>> I have to call it a day. I have no idea why the patches are becoming
>> corrupt and hence how to fix it, it’s probably something
Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
> I have to call it a day. I have no idea why the patches are becoming
> corrupt and hence how to fix it, it’s probably something Apple has
> done to git, or maybe MS to my email server.
Or maybe it's just that your editor saves things with the wrong type o
I have to call it a day. I have no idea why the patches are becoming corrupt
and hence how to fix it, it’s probably something Apple has done to git, or
maybe MS to my email server.
Sadly I also think that the only way this patch/functionality will ever be
acceptable is if someone else writes i
Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
> ctinfo is a new tc filter action module. It is designed to restore
> information contained in firewall conntrack marks to other packet fields
> and is typically used on packet ingress paths. At present it has two
> independent sub-functions or operating
ctinfo is a new tc filter action module. It is designed to restore
information contained in firewall conntrack marks to other packet fields
and is typically used on packet ingress paths. At present it has two
independent sub-functions or operating modes, DSCP restoration mode &
skb mark restorati
