Re: [PATCH net-next v4] ipv6: sysctl to restrict candidate source addresses

2015-07-21 Thread David Miller
From: Erik Kline Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:06:34 +0200 > I thought perhaps "use_oif_addr_only" was a slightly clearer sysctl name. > > (Maybe it should be plural, "use_oif_addrs_only"?) I think plural would be better too, please respin with that change. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list

Re: [PATCH net-next v4] ipv6: sysctl to restrict candidate source addresses

2015-07-20 Thread Erik Kline
I thought perhaps "use_oif_addr_only" was a slightly clearer sysctl name. (Maybe it should be plural, "use_oif_addrs_only"?) On 20 July 2015 at 16:04, Erik Kline wrote: > Per RFC 6724, section 4, "Candidate Source Addresses": > > It is RECOMMENDED that the candidate source addresses be the s

[PATCH net-next v4] ipv6: sysctl to restrict candidate source addresses

2015-07-20 Thread Erik Kline
Per RFC 6724, section 4, "Candidate Source Addresses": It is RECOMMENDED that the candidate source addresses be the set of unicast addresses assigned to the interface that will be used to send to the destination (the "outgoing" interface). Add a sysctl to enable this behaviour. Signe