On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 07:59:48AM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On 24/07/18 04:06 PM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > Each lockless action currently does its own RCU locking in ->act().
> > This is allows using plain RCU accessor, even if the context
> > is really RCU BH.
> >
> > This change drops the
Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:06:41PM CEST, pab...@redhat.com wrote:
>Each lockless action currently does its own RCU locking in ->act().
>This is allows using plain RCU accessor, even if the context
>is really RCU BH.
>
>This change drops the per action RCU lock, replace the accessors
>with _bh variant,
On 24/07/18 04:06 PM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
Each lockless action currently does its own RCU locking in ->act().
This is allows using plain RCU accessor, even if the context
is really RCU BH.
This change drops the per action RCU lock, replace the accessors
with _bh variant, cleans up a bit the surro
Each lockless action currently does its own RCU locking in ->act().
This is allows using plain RCU accessor, even if the context
is really RCU BH.
This change drops the per action RCU lock, replace the accessors
with _bh variant, cleans up a bit the surronding code and documents
the RCU status in
