On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 13:50:46 +0530
Leslie Monis wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 04:38:11PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:39:54 +0530
> > Leslie Monis wrote:
> >
> > > The current implementation of the PIE queuing discipline is according to
> > > the
> > > IETF d
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 04:38:11PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:39:54 +0530
> Leslie Monis wrote:
>
> > The current implementation of the PIE queuing discipline is according to the
> > IETF draft [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pan-aqm-pie-00] and the paper
> > [PIE:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:38 PM Stephen Hemminger
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:39:54 +0530
> Leslie Monis wrote:
>
> > The current implementation of the PIE queuing discipline is according to the
> > IETF draft [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pan-aqm-pie-00] and the paper
> > [PIE: A Light
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:39:54 +0530
Leslie Monis wrote:
> The current implementation of the PIE queuing discipline is according to the
> IETF draft [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pan-aqm-pie-00] and the paper
> [PIE: A Lightweight Control Scheme to Address the Bufferbloat Problem].
> However, a
From: Leslie Monis
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:39:54 +0530
> The current implementation of the PIE queuing discipline is according to the
> IETF draft [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pan-aqm-pie-00] and the paper
> [PIE: A Lightweight Control Scheme to Address the Bufferbloat Problem].
> However,
The current implementation of the PIE queuing discipline is according to the
IETF draft [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pan-aqm-pie-00] and the paper
[PIE: A Lightweight Control Scheme to Address the Bufferbloat Problem].
However, a lot of necessary modifications and enhancements have been propos
