On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 08:36:31 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> >+ case NFP_PORT_PF_PORT:
> >> >+ return devlink_port_register(devlink, &port->dl_port,
> >> >+ (port->pf_id + 1) * 1 +
> >> >+ port->pf_split_id * 1000);
Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 08:07:24PM CET, jakub.kicin...@netronome.com wrote:
>On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 09:43:47 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 07:04:49PM CET, jakub.kicin...@netronome.com wrote:
>> >Register all representors as devlink ports.
>> >
>> >The port_index is slightly tricky to fi
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 09:43:47 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 07:04:49PM CET, jakub.kicin...@netronome.com wrote:
> >Register all representors as devlink ports.
> >
> >The port_index is slightly tricky to figure out, we use a bit of
> >arbitrary math to create unique IDs for PCI ports
Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 07:04:49PM CET, jakub.kicin...@netronome.com wrote:
>Register all representors as devlink ports.
>
>The port_index is slightly tricky to figure out, we use a bit of
>arbitrary math to create unique IDs for PCI ports.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
>---
> .../net/ethernet/net
Register all representors as devlink ports.
The port_index is slightly tricky to figure out, we use a bit of
arbitrary math to create unique IDs for PCI ports.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
---
.../net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c | 40 ++-
.../net/ethernet/netronome/nf
