Hi Harald,
On 12/12/2020 12:22, Harald Welte wrote:
Hi Jonas,
thanks again for your patches, they are very much appreciated.
However, I don't think that it is "that easy".
PDP contexts (at least) in GPRS/EDGE and UMTS come in three flavors:
* IPv4 only
* IPv6 only
* IPv4v6 (i.e. both an IPv4
Hi Jonas,
thanks again for your patches, they are very much appreciated.
However, I don't think that it is "that easy".
PDP contexts (at least) in GPRS/EDGE and UMTS come in three flavors:
* IPv4 only
* IPv6 only
* IPv4v6 (i.e. both an IPv4 and an IPv6 address within the same tunnel)
See for ex
Hi Jonas,
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 08:05:40AM +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> Yes, you're probably right. Given that IPv6 isn't really optional in
> contexts where this driver is relevant, [...]
I strongly contest this statement. GTP is used in a lot of legacy contexts
without any IPv6 requirements wh
Hi Pravin,
On 12/12/2020 06:51, Pravin Shelar wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 4:29 AM Jonas Bonn wrote:
This patch adds support for handling IPv6. Both the GTP tunnel and the
tunneled packets may be IPv6; as they constitute independent streams,
both v4-over-v6 and v6-over-v4 are supported, as
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 4:29 AM Jonas Bonn wrote:
>
> This patch adds support for handling IPv6. Both the GTP tunnel and the
> tunneled packets may be IPv6; as they constitute independent streams,
> both v4-over-v6 and v6-over-v4 are supported, as well.
>
> This patch includes only the driver fun
This patch adds support for handling IPv6. Both the GTP tunnel and the
tunneled packets may be IPv6; as they constitute independent streams,
both v4-over-v6 and v6-over-v4 are supported, as well.
This patch includes only the driver functionality for IPv6 support. A
follow-on patch will add suppo
