Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: bgmac: Pad packets to a minimum size

2017-11-10 Thread Florian Fainelli
On 11/10/2017 03:10 AM, David Laight wrote: > From: Florian Fainelli >> Sent: 09 November 2017 22:35 >> >> In preparation for enabling Broadcom tags with b53, pad packets to a >> minimum size of 64 bytes (sans FCS) in order for the Broadcom switch to >> accept ingressing frames. Without this, we wo

RE: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: bgmac: Pad packets to a minimum size

2017-11-10 Thread David Laight
From: Florian Fainelli > Sent: 09 November 2017 22:35 > > In preparation for enabling Broadcom tags with b53, pad packets to a > minimum size of 64 bytes (sans FCS) in order for the Broadcom switch to > accept ingressing frames. Without this, we would typically be able to > DHCP, but not resolve w

[PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: bgmac: Pad packets to a minimum size

2017-11-09 Thread Florian Fainelli
In preparation for enabling Broadcom tags with b53, pad packets to a minimum size of 64 bytes (sans FCS) in order for the Broadcom switch to accept ingressing frames. Without this, we would typically be able to DHCP, but not resolve with ARP because packets are too small and get rejected by the swi