On 7/3/18, 6:15 AM, "Neal Cardwell" wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 7:49 PM Yuchung Cheng wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Lawrence Brakmo wrote:
> >
> > DCTCP depends on the CA_EVENT_NON_DELAYED_ACK and CA_EVENT_DELAYED_ACK
> > notifications to keep track if it
On 7/2/18, 4:50 PM, "Yuchung Cheng" wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Lawrence Brakmo wrote:
>
> DCTCP depends on the CA_EVENT_NON_DELAYED_ACK and CA_EVENT_DELAYED_ACK
> notifications to keep track if it needs to send an ACK for packets that
> were received with a partic
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 7:49 PM Yuchung Cheng wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Lawrence Brakmo wrote:
> >
> > DCTCP depends on the CA_EVENT_NON_DELAYED_ACK and CA_EVENT_DELAYED_ACK
> > notifications to keep track if it needs to send an ACK for packets that
> > were received with a partic
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Lawrence Brakmo wrote:
>
> DCTCP depends on the CA_EVENT_NON_DELAYED_ACK and CA_EVENT_DELAYED_ACK
> notifications to keep track if it needs to send an ACK for packets that
> were received with a particular ECN state but whose ACK was delayed.
>
> Under some circumst
DCTCP depends on the CA_EVENT_NON_DELAYED_ACK and CA_EVENT_DELAYED_ACK
notifications to keep track if it needs to send an ACK for packets that
were received with a particular ECN state but whose ACK was delayed.
Under some circumstances, for example when a delayed ACK is sent with a
data packet, D
