Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] regmap: Allow installing custom reg_update_bits function

2015-10-06 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:22:08AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 10:57:15 +0100 > > I obviously can't just merge in net-next. > People do this all the time, when needed. My history never changes, > and the networking tree is one of the first trees pulled into > linux-next, s

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] regmap: Allow installing custom reg_update_bits function

2015-10-06 Thread David Miller
From: Mark Brown Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 10:57:15 +0100 > I obviously can't just merge in net-next. People do this all the time, when needed. My history never changes, and the networking tree is one of the first trees pulled into linux-next, so this is always safe. -- To unsubscribe from this lis

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] regmap: Allow installing custom reg_update_bits function

2015-10-06 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 11:21:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > Ugh, this is a mess :( Can you please drop this patch instead? > I can't just "drop" changes. Once a commit hits my tree it is part > of the permanent record. I was expecting a revert if you want to keep the branch fast forward

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] regmap: Allow installing custom reg_update_bits function

2015-10-05 Thread David Miller
From: Mark Brown Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:25:31 +0100 > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:16:09AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > >> >> Applied. > >> > Thanks David. However, I've sent a v3 patch, and also expecting feedback >> > from Mark Brown on the regmap portion of it. > >> Please send me relative

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] regmap: Allow installing custom reg_update_bits function

2015-10-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:16:09AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > >> Applied. > > Thanks David. However, I've sent a v3 patch, and also expecting feedback > > from Mark Brown on the regmap portion of it. > Please send me relative changes from v2 to v3, thanks. > Sorry about that. Ugh, this is a

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] regmap: Allow installing custom reg_update_bits function

2015-10-05 Thread David Miller
From: Jon Ringle Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 07:57:00 -0400 (EDT) > > > On Mon, 5 Oct 2015, David Miller wrote: > >> From: j...@ringle.org >> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:43:20 -0400 >> >> > From: Jon Ringle >> > >> > This commit allows installing a custom reg_update_bits function for cases >> > wh

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] regmap: Allow installing custom reg_update_bits function

2015-10-05 Thread Jon Ringle
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015, David Miller wrote: > From: j...@ringle.org > Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:43:20 -0400 > > > From: Jon Ringle > > > > This commit allows installing a custom reg_update_bits function for cases > > where > > the hardware provides a mechanism to set or clear register bits witho

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] regmap: Allow installing custom reg_update_bits function

2015-10-05 Thread David Miller
From: j...@ringle.org Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:43:20 -0400 > From: Jon Ringle > > This commit allows installing a custom reg_update_bits function for cases > where > the hardware provides a mechanism to set or clear register bits without a > read/modify/write cycle. Such is the case with the M

[PATCH net-next v2 1/2] regmap: Allow installing custom reg_update_bits function

2015-10-01 Thread jon
From: Jon Ringle This commit allows installing a custom reg_update_bits function for cases where the hardware provides a mechanism to set or clear register bits without a read/modify/write cycle. Such is the case with the Microchip ENCX24J600. Signed-off-by: Jon Ringle --- drivers/base/regmap/