Hi,
On Sat, 7 May 2016 20:25:40 -0600 David Ahern wrote:
> > - On which circumstances we end up entering
> > l3mdev_ip_rcv/l3mdev_ip6_rcv where skb->dev is the master?
> > If I got it right, we enter 'ip_rcv_finish' on a slave device,
> > the callback is invoked and eventually sets
On 5/7/16 12:32 PM, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
Hi David,
On Sat, 7 May 2016 08:50:49 -0600 David Ahern wrote:
+static inline
+struct sk_buff *l3mdev_l3_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, u16 proto)
+{
+ struct net_device *master = NULL;
+
+ if (netif_is_l3_slave(skb->dev))
+ master
Hi David,
On Sat, 7 May 2016 08:50:49 -0600 David Ahern wrote:
> >> +static inline
> >> +struct sk_buff *l3mdev_l3_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, u16 proto)
> >> +{
> >> + struct net_device *master = NULL;
> >> +
> >> + if (netif_is_l3_slave(skb->dev))
> >> + master = netdev_master_upper_dev
On 5/7/16 2:30 AM, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
Hi David,
On Fri, 6 May 2016 18:49:40 -0700 David Ahern wrote:
+static bool ipv6_ndisc_frame(const struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ const struct ipv6hdr *ipv6h = (struct ipv6hdr *)skb->data;
+ size_t hlen = sizeof(*ipv6h);
+ bool rc = false
Hi David,
On Fri, 6 May 2016 18:49:40 -0700 David Ahern wrote:
> +static bool ipv6_ndisc_frame(const struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + const struct ipv6hdr *ipv6h = (struct ipv6hdr *)skb->data;
> + size_t hlen = sizeof(*ipv6h);
> + bool rc = false;
> +
> + if (ipv6h->nexthdr == NEXTH
Currently the VRF driver uses the rx_handler to switch the skb device
to the VRF device. Switching the dev prior to the ip / ipv6 layer
means the VRF driver has to duplicate IP/IPv6 processing which adds
overhead and makes features such as retaining the ingress device index
more complicated than ne
