Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:26:25PM CEST, and...@lunn.ch wrote:
>> Yes, this setting can be used to reduce effect of broadcast storms.
>
>So one way to solve this is to teach the software bridge about
>broadcast storm control. Put some rate limiting into its broadcast
>flood handling. Then add a switch
> Yes, this setting can be used to reduce effect of broadcast storms.
So one way to solve this is to teach the software bridge about
broadcast storm control. Put some rate limiting into its broadcast
flood handling. Then add a switchdev call which passes this down into
the switch.
Or look at doin
On 26. juli 2017 19:14, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 06:15:49PM +0200, Egil Hjelmeland wrote:
Allowing per-port access to Switch Engine Broadcast Throttling Register
Hi Egil
In general, we are against using sysfs. If there is a generic
mechanism, that applies for all sorts of ne
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 06:15:49PM +0200, Egil Hjelmeland wrote:
> Allowing per-port access to Switch Engine Broadcast Throttling Register
Hi Egil
In general, we are against using sysfs. If there is a generic
mechanism, that applies for all sorts of network interfaces, it should
be used instead o
Allowing per-port access to Switch Engine Broadcast Throttling Register
Also added lan9303_write_switch_reg_mask()
Signed-off-by: Egil Hjelmeland
---
drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c | 83 ++
1 file changed, 83 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/la
