On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 06:11:25AM -0800, Dave Taht wrote:
> Jamal Hadi Salim writes:
>
> > On 2019-02-25 8:43 a.m., Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> >> On 2019-02-25 5:20 a.m., Leslie Monis wrote:
> >>> The current implementation of the PIE queuing discipline is
> >>> according to the
> >>> IETF draft
On 2019-02-25 9:11 a.m., Dave Taht wrote:
Jamal Hadi Salim writes:
On 2019-02-25 8:43 a.m., Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
On 2019-02-25 5:20 a.m., Leslie Monis wrote:
The current implementation of the PIE queuing discipline is
according to the
IETF draft [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pan-aqm-p
Jamal Hadi Salim writes:
> On 2019-02-25 8:43 a.m., Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>> On 2019-02-25 5:20 a.m., Leslie Monis wrote:
>>> The current implementation of the PIE queuing discipline is
>>> according to the
>>> IETF draft [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pan-aqm-pie-00] and
>>> the paper
>>> [
On 2019-02-25 8:43 a.m., Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
On 2019-02-25 5:20 a.m., Leslie Monis wrote:
The current implementation of the PIE queuing discipline is according
to the
IETF draft [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pan-aqm-pie-00] and the
paper
[PIE: A Lightweight Control Scheme to Address th
On 2019-02-25 5:20 a.m., Leslie Monis wrote:
The current implementation of the PIE queuing discipline is according to the
IETF draft [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pan-aqm-pie-00] and the paper
[PIE: A Lightweight Control Scheme to Address the Bufferbloat Problem].
However, a lot of necessary
The current implementation of the PIE queuing discipline is according to the
IETF draft [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pan-aqm-pie-00] and the paper
[PIE: A Lightweight Control Scheme to Address the Bufferbloat Problem].
However, a lot of necessary modifications and enhancements have been propos
