From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 22:46:52 +0100
> I think you are replying to the wrong patch? This comment fits to
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg546662.html
I noticed that right after I hit send, you are right.
Sorry for the confusion.
> Although i don't like it, i think
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 01:22:50PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Miquel Raynal
> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:55:05 +0100
>
> > After a first attempt of bringing S2RAM support to the DSA switch, it
> > has been reported that a part of the configuration was lost during the
> > cycle. This second
From: Miquel Raynal
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:55:05 +0100
> After a first attempt of bringing S2RAM support to the DSA switch, it
> has been reported that a part of the configuration was lost during the
> cycle. This second version adds a first patch that saves the rules in
> a per-chip list when
After a first attempt of bringing S2RAM support to the DSA switch, it
has been reported that a part of the configuration was lost during the
cycle. This second version adds a first patch that saves the rules in
a per-chip list when they are applied, so that in the second patch we
bring S2RAM suppor
