On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 3:18 PM Yuchung Cheng wrote:
> Hi David: thanks for taking this patch - I didn't notice this earlier
> but it seems patch v1 was applied instead of v2? should I submit a
> v2-v1-diff patch?
Yes, please, send an additional patch.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 11:23 AM, David Miller wrote:
>
> From: Yuchung Cheng
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 13:09:02 -0700
>
> > Previously TCP initial receive buffer is ~87KB by default and
> > the initial receive window is ~29KB (20 MSS). This patch changes
> > the two numbers to 128KB and ~64KB (ro
From: Yuchung Cheng
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 13:09:02 -0700
> Previously TCP initial receive buffer is ~87KB by default and
> the initial receive window is ~29KB (20 MSS). This patch changes
> the two numbers to 128KB and ~64KB (rounding down to the multiples
> of MSS) respectively. The patch also
Previously TCP initial receive buffer is ~87KB by default and
the initial receive window is ~29KB (20 MSS). This patch changes
the two numbers to 128KB and ~64KB (rounding down to the multiples
of MSS) respectively. The patch also simplifies the calculations s.t.
the two numbers are directly contro
