Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: sched: flower: refactor reoffload for concurrent access

2019-04-25 Thread Jiri Pirko
Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 08:53:31AM CEST, vla...@mellanox.com wrote: >Recent changes that introduced unlocked flower did not properly account for >case when reoffload is initiated concurrently with filter updates. To fix >the issue, extend flower with 'hw_filters' list that is used to store >filters th

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: sched: flower: refactor reoffload for concurrent access

2019-04-24 Thread David Miller
From: Vlad Buslov Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:53:31 +0300 > Recent changes that introduced unlocked flower did not properly account for > case when reoffload is initiated concurrently with filter updates. To fix > the issue, extend flower with 'hw_filters' list that is used to store > filters that

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: sched: flower: refactor reoffload for concurrent access

2019-04-24 Thread Saeed Mahameed
On Wed, 2019-04-24 at 09:53 +0300, Vlad Buslov wrote: > Recent changes that introduced unlocked flower did not properly > account for > case when reoffload is initiated concurrently with filter updates. To > fix > the issue, extend flower with 'hw_filters' list that is used to store > filters that

[PATCH net-next v2] net: sched: flower: refactor reoffload for concurrent access

2019-04-23 Thread Vlad Buslov
Recent changes that introduced unlocked flower did not properly account for case when reoffload is initiated concurrently with filter updates. To fix the issue, extend flower with 'hw_filters' list that is used to store filters that don't have 'skip_hw' flag set. Filter is added to the list when it