From: Jiri Pirko
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 08:35:02 +0100
> How do you imagine this mode should looks like? Could you draw me some
> example?
Well, first of all, there is no reason we can't provide a mechanism by
which the driver can request and obtain a FIB dump.
And it can be designed in a way to
Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:35:03PM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>On 11/2/16, 6:48 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 02:29:40PM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:13:42AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetwo
On 11/2/16, 6:48 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 02:29:40PM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:13:42AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
I understand..but, if you are adding some
Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 02:29:40PM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:13:42AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>>
>[snip]
>
>>>I understand..but, if you are adding some core infrastructure for switchdev
>>>..it c
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 06:29:40AM -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:13:42AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
> >>
> [snip]
>
> >>I understand..but, if you are adding some core infrastructure for switchdev
> >>..it ca
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:13:42AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>
[snip]
>>I understand..but, if you are adding some core infrastructure for switchdev
>>..it cannot be
>>based on the number of simple use-cases or data you have today.
>>
Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 04:36:50PM CET, da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>From: Roopa Prabhu
>Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 08:14:14 -0700
>
>> On 11/1/16, 7:19 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 00:57 +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:24:06PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>>
Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:13:42AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>On 11/1/16, 10:03 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>> Hi Roopa,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:14:14AM -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>>>
>[snip]
>>> I have the same concern as Eric here.
>>>
>>> I understand why you need it, but can the d
On 11/1/16, 10:03 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Hi Roopa,
>
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:14:14AM -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>>
[snip]
>> I have the same concern as Eric here.
>>
>> I understand why you need it, but can the driver request for an initial dump
>> and that
>> dump be made more efficient s
Hi Roopa,
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:14:14AM -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> On 11/1/16, 7:19 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 00:57 +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:24:06PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>> How well will this work for large FIB tables ?
> >>
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 07:19:59AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 00:57 +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:24:06PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > > How well will this work for large FIB tables ?
> > >
> > > Holding rtnl while sending thousands of skb w
From: Roopa Prabhu
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 08:14:14 -0700
> On 11/1/16, 7:19 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 00:57 +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:24:06PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
How well will this work for large FIB tables ?
Holding rtn
On 11/1/16, 7:19 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 00:57 +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:24:06PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> How well will this work for large FIB tables ?
>>>
>>> Holding rtnl while sending thousands of skb will prevent consumers to
>>> mak
On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 00:57 +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:24:06PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > How well will this work for large FIB tables ?
> >
> > Holding rtnl while sending thousands of skb will prevent consumers to
> > make progress ?
>
> Can you please clarify w
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:24:06PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 23:13 +0200, ido...@idosch.org wrote:
> > From: Ido Schimmel
> >
> > When registering a FIB notifier block we should notify the caller of
> > already existing FIB entries and rules, as it would otherwise have an
On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 23:13 +0200, ido...@idosch.org wrote:
> From: Ido Schimmel
>
> When registering a FIB notifier block we should notify the caller of
> already existing FIB entries and rules, as it would otherwise have an
> incomplete view of the FIB tables. This is especially important for
>
From: Ido Schimmel
When registering a FIB notifier block we should notify the caller of
already existing FIB entries and rules, as it would otherwise have an
incomplete view of the FIB tables. This is especially important for
switchdev drivers that support FIB offloads. Failing to notify them of
17 matches
Mail list logo
