On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 04:08:22AM +0800, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 09:29:34 +0800, Yi Yang wrote:
> > +static int set_nsh(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sw_flow_key *flow_key,
> > + const struct nlattr *a)
> > +{
> > + struct nshhdr *nh;
> > + size_t length;
> > + int
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 03:57:41AM +0800, Eric Garver wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:29:34AM +0800, Yi Yang wrote:
> [...]
> > +int nsh_pop(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +{
> > + struct nshhdr *nh;
> > + size_t length;
> > + __be16 inner_proto;
> > +
> > + if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, NSH_BASE_H
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 09:29:34 +0800, Yi Yang wrote:
> +static int set_nsh(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sw_flow_key *flow_key,
> +const struct nlattr *a)
> +{
> + struct nshhdr *nh;
> + size_t length;
> + int err;
> + u8 flags;
> + u8 ttl;
> + int i;
> +
> +
On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:57:41 -0400, Eric Garver wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:29:34AM +0800, Yi Yang wrote:
> > + if (WARN_ON(is_push_nsh && is_mask))
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> OVS_NLERR() is probably more appropriate.
No, not here. If this happens, it's a bug in the kernel and
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:29:34AM +0800, Yi Yang wrote:
[...]
> +int nsh_pop(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct nshhdr *nh;
> + size_t length;
> + __be16 inner_proto;
> +
> + if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, NSH_BASE_HDR_LEN))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + nh = (struct nshhdr *)
v13->v14
- Rename skb_push_nsh to nsh_push per Dave's comment
- Rename skb_pop_nsh to nsh_pop per Dave's comment
v12->v13
- Fix NSH header length check in set_nsh
v11->v12
- Fix missing changes old comments pointed out
- Fix new comments for v11
v10->v11
- Fix the left three disputable com
