On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 14:18:28 -0800 Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> This is set of cleanup patches for zerocopy which are intended
> to allow a introduction of a different zerocopy implementation.
>
> The top level API will use the skb_zcopy_*() functions, while
> the current TCP specific zerocopy ends up u
[resending to fix From: lines]
This is set of cleanup patches for zerocopy which are intended
to allow a introduction of a different zerocopy implementation.
The top level API will use the skb_zcopy_*() functions, while
the current TCP specific zerocopy ends up using msg_zerocopy_*()
calls.
Ther
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 03:45:55PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 1/5/21 3:40 PM, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 03:11:03PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> On 1/5/21 2:06 PM, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> >>> From: Jonathan Lemon
> >>>
> >>> This is set of cleanup patches for
On 1/5/21 3:40 PM, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 03:11:03PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 1/5/21 2:06 PM, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
>>> From: Jonathan Lemon
>>>
>>> This is set of cleanup patches for zerocopy which are intended
>>> to allow a introduction of a different zeroco
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 03:11:03PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 1/5/21 2:06 PM, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> > From: Jonathan Lemon
> >
> > This is set of cleanup patches for zerocopy which are intended
> > to allow a introduction of a different zerocopy implementation.
> >
> > The top level A
On 1/5/21 2:06 PM, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> From: Jonathan Lemon
>
> This is set of cleanup patches for zerocopy which are intended
> to allow a introduction of a different zerocopy implementation.
>
> The top level API will use the skb_zcopy_*() functions, while
> the current TCP specific zeroco
From: Jonathan Lemon
This is set of cleanup patches for zerocopy which are intended
to allow a introduction of a different zerocopy implementation.
The top level API will use the skb_zcopy_*() functions, while
the current TCP specific zerocopy ends up using msg_zerocopy_*()
calls.
There should