> From: Florian Fainelli [mailto:f.faine...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 12:40 PM
>
> Can we also have a fast-path bypass in case time stamping is not
> supported by the switch so we don't have to even try to classify this
> packet only to realize we don't have a port_rxtsamp() o
On 09/28/2017 08:25 AM, Brandon Streiff wrote:
> Forward the rx/tx timestamp machinery from the dsa infrastructure to the
> switch driver.
>
> On the rx side, defer delivery of skbs until we have an rx timestamp.
> This mimicks the behavior of skb_defer_rx_timestamp. The implementation
> does have
Forward the rx/tx timestamp machinery from the dsa infrastructure to the
switch driver.
On the rx side, defer delivery of skbs until we have an rx timestamp.
This mimicks the behavior of skb_defer_rx_timestamp. The implementation
does have to thread through the tagging protocol handlers because
it
