On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 03:29:01PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Le 04/06/2016 13:38, Andrew Lunn a écrit :
> >> index e8386157de30..938262010524 100644
> >> --- a/net/dsa/dsa2.c
> >> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
> >> @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static int dsa_ds_apply(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
> >> struct
Le 04/06/2016 13:38, Andrew Lunn a écrit :
>> index e8386157de30..938262010524 100644
>> --- a/net/dsa/dsa2.c
>> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
>> @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static int dsa_ds_apply(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
>> struct dsa_switch *ds)
>> continue;
>> }
>>
>> -retur
> index e8386157de30..938262010524 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/dsa2.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
> @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static int dsa_ds_apply(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
> struct dsa_switch *ds)
> continue;
> }
>
> - return 0;
> + return dsa_cpu_port_ethtool_setup(ds
Now that we can properly support multiple distinct trees in the system,
using a global variable: dsa_cpu_port_ethtool_ops is getting clobbered
as soon as the second switch tree gets probed, and we don't want that.
We need to move this to be dynamically allocated, and since we can't
really be compa
