> > Hi Vivien
> >
> > Bike shedding a bit, but i would call this
> > mv88e6xxx_port_fdb_prepare_add.
>
> I think port_fdb_prepare is fine because it is the only step that
> actually needs the 2-phase model. del and dump are safe and don't need
> pre-check.
O.K. I don't have a strong opinion, i j
Hi Andrew,
On Oct. Thursday 08 (41) 02:25 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 07:48:29PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> > Push the prepare phase for FDB operations down to the DSA drivers, with
> > a new port_fdb_prepare function. Currently only mv88e6xxx is affected.
> >
> > Signed-
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Vivien Didelot
wrote:
> Push the prepare phase for FDB operations down to the DSA drivers, with
> a new port_fdb_prepare function. Currently only mv88e6xxx is affected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot
Reviewed-by: Scott Feldman
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 07:48:29PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Push the prepare phase for FDB operations down to the DSA drivers, with
> a new port_fdb_prepare function. Currently only mv88e6xxx is affected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6171.c | 1 +
> drive
Push the prepare phase for FDB operations down to the DSA drivers, with
a new port_fdb_prepare function. Currently only mv88e6xxx is affected.
Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot
---
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6171.c | 1 +
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6352.c | 1 +
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c | 10 ++
dr
