On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:59:55AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 03/18/2018 12:19 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> +static int dsa_slave_nway_reset(struct net_device *dev)
> >> +{
> >> + struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(dev);
> >> +
> >> + return phylink_ethtool_nway_reset
On 03/19/2018 11:09 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:59:55AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> On 03/18/2018 12:19 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
+static int dsa_slave_nway_reset(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to
Hi Andrew,
On 03/18/2018 12:19 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> +static int dsa_slave_nway_reset(struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> +struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(dev);
>> +
>> +return phylink_ethtool_nway_reset(dp->pl);
>> +}
>
> Hi Florian
>
> I've seen in one of Russells trees a patc
> +static int dsa_slave_nway_reset(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(dev);
> +
> + return phylink_ethtool_nway_reset(dp->pl);
> +}
Hi Florian
I've seen in one of Russells trees a patch to put a phylink into
net_device. That would make a generic slave
Add support for PHYLINK within the DSA subsystem in order to support more
complex devices such as pluggable (SFP) and non-pluggable (SFF) modules, 10G
PHYs, and traditional PHYs. Using PHYLINK allows us to drop some amount of
complexity we had while probing fixed and non-fixed PHYs using Device Tre
