veth does not really transmit packets only moves the skb from one
netdev to another so gso and checksum is not really needed. Add
the features to mpls_features to get the same benefit and performance
with MPLS as without it.
Reported-by: Lennert Buytenhek
Signed-off-by: David Ahern
---
drivers/
On 8/17/16 4:41 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 14:49 -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>> veth does not really transmit packets only moves the skb from one
>> netdev to another so gso and checksum is not really needed. Add
>> the features to mpls_features to get the same benefit and perfor
On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 14:49 -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> veth does not really transmit packets only moves the skb from one
> netdev to another so gso and checksum is not really needed. Add
> the features to mpls_features to get the same benefit and performance
> with MPLS as without it.
It seems mp
veth does not really transmit packets only moves the skb from one
netdev to another so gso and checksum is not really needed. Add
the features to mpls_features to get the same benefit and performance
with MPLS as without it.
Reported-by: Lennert Buytenhek
Signed-off-by: David Ahern
---
drivers/
From: David Ahern
With hw checksum and gso set, netperf through veth for mpls is
on par without mpls.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern
Reported-by: Lennert Buytenhek
---
drivers/net/veth.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/veth.c b/drivers/net/veth.c
index f37a6e6..5db
