On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 00:36:22 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> which I used for testing until I exposed this into an ioctl. I knew I
> forgot to do something, and that was to squash that patch into this one.
> So I'll need to send a v2, because otherwise this doesn't apply to
> mainline. Please review
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 12:20:32AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> For PPS output (perout period is 1.0), accept the new "phase"
> parameter from the periodic output request structure.
>
> For both PPS and freeform output, accept the new "on" argument for
> specifying the duty cycle of the
For PPS output (perout period is 1.0), accept the new "phase"
parameter from the periodic output request structure.
For both PPS and freeform output, accept the new "on" argument for
specifying the duty cycle of the generated signal. Preserve the old
defaults for this "on" time: 1 us for P
