On Tue, 2 Feb 2021, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:32:47PM +0200, Paul Blakey wrote:
> > Add support for matching on ct_state reply flag.
>
> Sorry for the late reply, missed the patchset here. (just noticed
> because of the iproute2 patch, thanks for the Cc in the
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:32:47PM +0200, Paul Blakey wrote:
> Add support for matching on ct_state reply flag.
Sorry for the late reply, missed the patchset here. (just noticed
because of the iproute2 patch, thanks for the Cc in there)
Only one question though. Is it safe to assume that this wil
Add support for matching on ct_state reply flag.
Example:
$ tc filter add dev ens1f0_0 ingress prio 1 chain 1 proto ip flower \
ct_state +trk+est+rpl \
action mirred egress redirect dev ens1f0_1
$ tc filter add dev ens1f0_1 ingress prio 1 chain 1 proto ip flower \
ct_state +trk+est-rpl \
a
