On 06/05/2016 08:19 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> How much support do we want to have for the old binding for in tree
>> platforms? Is the plan to migrate them all to the new binding?
>
> I think there are three cases to consider.
>
> 1) There are some old boards using setup.c files which have a plat
> How much support do we want to have for the old binding for in tree
> platforms? Is the plan to migrate them all to the new binding?
I think there are three cases to consider.
1) There are some old boards using setup.c files which have a platform
device, platform data, etc. I've never used D
Le 04/06/2016 13:00, Andrew Lunn a écrit :
>> -static int dsa_cpu_parse(struct device_node *port, u32 index,
>> - struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
>> - struct dsa_switch *ds)
>> +static int _dsa_cpu_parse(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
>> + st
> -static int dsa_cpu_parse(struct device_node *port, u32 index,
> - struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
> - struct dsa_switch *ds)
> +static int _dsa_cpu_parse(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
> +struct dsa_switch *ds,
> +
> @@ -626,8 +736,8 @@ static int _dsa_register_switch(struct dsa_switch *ds,
> struct device_node *np)
> {
> struct device_node *ports = dsa_get_ports(ds, np);
>
> - if (IS_ERR(ports))
> - return PTR_ERR(ports);
> + if (IS_ERR(ports) && PTR_ERR(ports) == -EINVAL)
> +
Extend dsa2.c to support parsing for the old binding, which mostly means
looking for more or less the same properties in different places.
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli
---
net/dsa/dsa2.c | 142 ++---
1 file changed, 126 insertions(+), 16 del
