From: David Ahern
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 17:46:37 -0700
> ok. patches 5-7 are not dependent on 1-4. Should I re-send outside of
> this set?
Yes, please respin.
Thanks David.
On 12/5/18 5:46 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> ok. patches 5-7 are not dependent on 1-4. Should I re-send outside of
> this set?
bleh. 5 is. I'll re-send.
On 12/5/18 5:44 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Ahern
> Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 15:34:09 -0800
>
>> @@ -270,37 +270,25 @@ static inline bool neigh_key_eq128(const struct
>> neighbour *n, const void *pkey)
>> (n32[2] ^ p32[2]) | (n32[3] ^ p32[3])) == 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static inl
From: David Ahern
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 15:34:09 -0800
> @@ -270,37 +270,25 @@ static inline bool neigh_key_eq128(const struct
> neighbour *n, const void *pkey)
> (n32[2] ^ p32[2]) | (n32[3] ^ p32[3])) == 0;
> }
>
> -static inline struct neighbour *___neigh_lookup_noref(
> -
From: David Ahern
There are no more direct callers of ___neigh_lookup_noref so no need
for it to be a standalone helper.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern
---
include/net/neighbour.h | 22 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/neighbour.h b/