> > + /* Timers is a special case -> we don't count how many cids require
>
> S/is/are/. CIDs?
What's implicitly meant here is the 'Timer[s] HW block'.
I understand it creates an odd looking English sentence, though.
Assuming there'll be a V2 for this we'd revise the comment;
Otherwise we'
On 4/3/2017 12:21 PM, Yuval Mintz wrote:
From: Michal Kalderon
When configuring the HW timers block we should set the number of CIDs
up until the last CID that require timers, instead of only those CIDs
whose protocol needs timers support.
Today, the protocols that require HW timers' support
From: Michal Kalderon
When configuring the HW timers block we should set the number of CIDs
up until the last CID that require timers, instead of only those CIDs
whose protocol needs timers support.
Today, the protocols that require HW timers' support have their CIDs
before any other protocol, b
