Each lockless action currently does its own RCU locking in ->act().
This is allows using plain RCU accessor, even if the context
is really RCU BH.
This change drops the per action RCU lock, replace the accessors
with _bh variant, cleans up a bit the surronding code and documents
the RCU status in
On Fri, 2018-07-13 at 16:41 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 07/13/2018 04:26 PM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-07-13 at 16:08 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > > On 07/13/2018 11:55 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > > > Each lockless action currently does its own RCU locking in ->act().
> > > > T
On 07/13/2018 04:26 PM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-07-13 at 16:08 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 07/13/2018 11:55 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>>> Each lockless action currently does its own RCU locking in ->act().
>>> This is allows using plain RCU accessor, even if the context
>>> is really
On Fri, 2018-07-13 at 16:08 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> On 07/13/2018 11:55 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > Each lockless action currently does its own RCU locking in ->act().
> > This is allows using plain RCU accessor, even if the context
> > is really RCU BH.
> >
> > This change d
Hi Paolo,
On 07/13/2018 11:55 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Each lockless action currently does its own RCU locking in ->act().
> This is allows using plain RCU accessor, even if the context
> is really RCU BH.
>
> This change drops the per action RCU lock, replace the accessors
> with _bh variant, cl
Each lockless action currently does its own RCU locking in ->act().
This is allows using plain RCU accessor, even if the context
is really RCU BH.
This change drops the per action RCU lock, replace the accessors
with _bh variant, cleans up a bit the surronding code and documents
the RCU status in
