On Mon, 2019-06-03 at 22:27 +, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-06-03 at 11:51 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 18:30 +, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 14:53 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > > > Experimental results[1] has shown that resorting to sever
On Mon, 2019-06-03 at 11:51 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 18:30 +, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 14:53 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > > Experimental results[1] has shown that resorting to several
> > > branches
> > > and a direct-call is faster than indirect
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 18:30 +, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 14:53 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > Experimental results[1] has shown that resorting to several branches
> > and a direct-call is faster than indirect call via retpoline, even
> > when the number of added branches go u
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 14:53 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Experimental results[1] has shown that resorting to several branches
> and a direct-call is faster than indirect call via retpoline, even
> when the number of added branches go up 5.
>
> This change adds two additional helpers, to cope with i
Experimental results[1] has shown that resorting to several branches
and a direct-call is faster than indirect call via retpoline, even
when the number of added branches go up 5.
This change adds two additional helpers, to cope with indirect calls
with up to 4 available direct call option. We will
