On 9/15/15 9:50 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
Looks like you can remove the check. I would prefer to let the stack
handle this case using normal mechanisms.
I had to do a bit of tracking but netif_running check equates roughly
to your IFF_UP case via,
...
Seem reasonable? Or did you put it there t
On 15-09-15 09:11 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 9/15/15 8:10 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
>> Nice, I like this. But just to be sure I read this correctly this will
>> only work on the ingress qdisc for now right? To get the tx side working
>> will require a bit more care.
>
> correct.
> For egre
On 9/15/15 8:10 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
Nice, I like this. But just to be sure I read this correctly this will
only work on the ingress qdisc for now right? To get the tx side working
will require a bit more care.
correct.
For egress I'm waiting for Daniel to resubmit his preclassifier patch
On 15-09-15 06:51 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> Existing bpf_clone_redirect() helper clones skb before redirecting
> it to RX or TX of destination netdev.
> Introduce bpf_redirect() helper that does that without cloning.
>
> Benchmarked with two hosts using 10G ixgbe NICs.
> One host is doing li
Existing bpf_clone_redirect() helper clones skb before redirecting
it to RX or TX of destination netdev.
Introduce bpf_redirect() helper that does that without cloning.
Benchmarked with two hosts using 10G ixgbe NICs.
One host is doing line rate pktgen.
Another host is configured as:
$ tc qdisc ad
