On 2020-10-31 10:12:15 [-0700], Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Nit: some networking drivers have a bool napi which means "are we
> running in napi context", the semantics here feel a little backwards,
> at least to me. But if I'm the only one thinking this, so be it.
I renamed it to `sched_napi'.
Sebast
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 23:54:53 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The driver uses in_irq() + in_serving_softirq() magic to decide if NAPI
> scheduling is required or packet processing.
>
> The usage of in_*() in drivers is phased out and Linus clearly requested
> that code which changes behavi
The driver uses in_irq() + in_serving_softirq() magic to decide if NAPI
scheduling is required or packet processing.
The usage of in_*() in drivers is phased out and Linus clearly requested
that code which changes behaviour depending on context should either be
seperated or the context be conveyed
