Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] dsa: Rename mv88e6123_61_65 to mv88e6123 to be consistent

2016-03-13 Thread Vivien Didelot
Hi Andrew, Andrew Lunn writes: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 03:10:13AM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote: >> Andrew Lunn writes: >> >> > All the drivers support multiple chips, but mv88e6123_61_65 is the >> > only one that reflects this in its naming. Change it to be consistent >> > with the other driv

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] dsa: Rename mv88e6123_61_65 to mv88e6123 to be consistent

2016-03-13 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 03:10:13AM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote: > Andrew Lunn writes: > > > All the drivers support multiple chips, but mv88e6123_61_65 is the > > only one that reflects this in its naming. Change it to be consistent > > with the other drivers. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] dsa: Rename mv88e6123_61_65 to mv88e6123 to be consistent

2016-03-12 Thread Vivien Didelot
Andrew Lunn writes: > All the drivers support multiple chips, but mv88e6123_61_65 is the > only one that reflects this in its naming. Change it to be consistent > with the other drivers. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot When mv88e6xxx will become a driver by its own

[PATCH net-next 1/5] dsa: Rename mv88e6123_61_65 to mv88e6123 to be consistent

2016-03-11 Thread Andrew Lunn
All the drivers support multiple chips, but mv88e6123_61_65 is the only one that reflects this in its naming. Change it to be consistent with the other drivers. Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn --- arch/arm/configs/multi_v5_defconfig | 2 +- arch/arm/configs/mvebu_v5_defconfig | 2 +- arch/arm/con