On 2/15/19 6:35 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 2/15/19 5:42 AM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Commit 8fce33317023 introduced the concept of NAPI per-channel and
>> independent cleaning of TX path.
>>
>> This is currently breaking performance in some cases. The scenario
>> happens when all packets are be
On 2/15/19 5:42 AM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Commit 8fce33317023 introduced the concept of NAPI per-channel and
> independent cleaning of TX path.
>
> This is currently breaking performance in some cases. The scenario
> happens when all packets are being received in Queue 0 but the TX is
> performed in
Commit 8fce33317023 introduced the concept of NAPI per-channel and
independent cleaning of TX path.
This is currently breaking performance in some cases. The scenario
happens when all packets are being received in Queue 0 but the TX is
performed in Queue != 0.
Fix this by using different NAPI ins
