On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> This is second part of dealing with suboptimal device gso parameters.
> In first patch (350c9f484bde "tcp_bbr: better deal with suboptimal GSO")
> we dealt with devices having low gso_max_segs
>
> Some devices lower gso_max_size from 64KB to
This is second part of dealing with suboptimal device gso parameters.
In first patch (350c9f484bde "tcp_bbr: better deal with suboptimal GSO")
we dealt with devices having low gso_max_segs
Some devices lower gso_max_size from 64KB to 16 KB (r8152 is an example)
In order to probe an optimal cwnd,