From: Tom Herbert
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:57:42 -0700
> @@ -130,6 +130,19 @@ int lwtunnel_build_state(struct net_device *dev, u16
> encap_type,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(lwtunnel_build_state);
>
> +void lwtstate_free(struct lwtunnel_state *lws)
There should only be one space between "void" and
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:57:42 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> @@ -43,13 +44,11 @@ struct lwtunnel_encap_ops {
> int (*get_encap_size)(struct lwtunnel_state *lwtstate);
> int (*cmp_encap)(struct lwtunnel_state *a, struct lwtunnel_state *b);
> int (*xmit)(struct sk_buff *skb);
> + vo
On 10/13/16, 5:57 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> Users of lwt tunnels may set up some secondary state in build_state
> function. Add a corresponding destroy_state function to allow users to
> clean up state. This destroy state function is called from lwstate_free.
> Also, we now free lwstate using kfree_
Users of lwt tunnels may set up some secondary state in build_state
function. Add a corresponding destroy_state function to allow users to
clean up state. This destroy state function is called from lwstate_free.
Also, we now free lwstate using kfree_rcu so user can assume structure
is not freed bef
